首页> 外文OA文献 >Recruitment, Selection and Retention of Nursing and Midwifery Students in Scottish Universities
【2h】

Recruitment, Selection and Retention of Nursing and Midwifery Students in Scottish Universities

机译:苏格兰大学护理和助产学生的招募,选拔和保留

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background; High attrition rates from pre-registration nursing and midwifery programmes have been reported in both the UK and in other countries. Objectives; A benchmarking study was commissioned by the Scottish Government to identify best practice in recruitment, selection and retention across Scottish Universities providing pre-registration programmes. Design; A survey of all universities providing pre-registration programmes in Scotland was conducted. Semi-structured face to face or telephone interviews were conducted with key personnel in each university. Documentary evidence was collected to supplement interview data and evidence recruitment, selection and retention practices. Settings: All universities in Scotland providing pre-registration nursing and/or midwifery programmes. Participants; All 10 identified universities agreed to take part and a total of 18 interviews were conducted. Methods; Semi-structured face to face and telephone interviews were conducted. Relevant documentary evidence was collected. All data were subject to thematic analysis. Findings; Universities are predominantly concerned with recruiting to the institution and not to the professions. Interviews are widely used, and a requirement of the NMC standards for education. However, there is no evidence base within the literature that they have predictive validity despite creating scales and scoring systems which remain unvalidated in the main. Whilst the study identified initiatives focused on addressing attrition/retention, most had not been evaluated often due to the multi-factorial nature of attrition/retention and difficulties with measurement. Conclusions; Recruitment selection and retention initiatives were generally poorly evaluated. Evidence from existing studies to support practices was mostly weakly supportive or absent. The benchmarking exercise highlights the need for a coordinated approach, supporting the development of a robust evidence base through the evaluation of local initiatives, and piloting and evaluation of new strategies. Evaluation strategies must take account of the local context to facilitate transferability of findings across different settings.
机译:背景;英国和其他国家都报告说,注册前护理和助产士计划的流失率很高。目标;苏格兰政府委托进行了一项基准研究,以识别提供预注册课程的苏格兰大学在招聘,选择和保留方面的最佳实践。设计;对苏格兰所有提供预注册课程的大学进行了调查。对每所大学的主要人员进行了半结构化的面对面或电话采访。收集了书面证据以补充访谈数据以及证据的收集,选择和保留做法。地点:苏格兰的所有大学都提供预注册护理和/或助产士课程。参加者;所有10所确定的大学都同意参加,并进行了18次面试。方法;进行了半结构化的面对面和电话采访。收集了相关的文件证据。所有数据均经过专题分析。发现;大学主要关心的是招募到该机构,而不是专业。面试被广泛使用,是NMC教育标准的要求。但是,文献中没有证据表明,尽管创建了量表和评分系统,但它们仍具有预测效度,而这些量表和评分系统基本上没有得到验证。尽管该研究确定了专注于解决损耗/保留的举措,但由于损耗/保留的多因素性质和测量的困难,大多数举措未得到经常评估。结论;招聘选择和保留计划通常没有得到很好的评估。现有研究对支持实践的证据大多缺乏支持或缺乏支持。基准测试强调需要采取一种协调的方法,通过评估本地举措以及试验和评估新策略来支持建立可靠的证据基础。评估策略必须考虑当地情况,以促进研究结果在不同环境下的可转移性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号